Defendants shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a member of the Internet media corporation D and a waiting member, Defendant B is a member of the guest Committee of D and the victim E is a member of the 20th National Assembly.

1. Defendant B is the title “F” in the private theory column of the Internet journalist D website with a view to slandering the victims at a non-permanent area in July 2016, and is deemed as a person of distinguished service for democratization 5.18.

It is thought that the country is too difficult to understand.

Any person who has no relation with the five and 18 of E members even if he/she is unhulled of snow.

5 At the time of 18, E was 16 years old and was 2 years old.

He also written a letter stating that he was a student of the Republic of Korea who was a student of the Republic of Korea in Seoul, not a student of the Republic of Korea in Gwangju or the former, and sent the plaintiff to the plaintiff on July 5, 2016, and made the Internet journalist to post it on the private book column of the Internet journal, so that many and unspecified visitors visiting the above website can see this letter.

However, the victim did not have been selected as a person of merit related to democratization 5.18.

Nevertheless, with the aim of slandering the victim, the Defendant posted a false fact openly through the information and communications network, thereby impairing the honor of the victim.

2. On July 2016, Defendant A: (a) registered 5,700 life expectancys as persons of distinguished service and enjoy two diversative compensation and preferential treatment with a view to slandering the victim at a non-permanent area; (b) Defendant A, as the title “H”.

During the opening of Seoul, I written a letter stating that the Plaintiff will be 16 years of age and 2 years of age as at the time when I became aware of the school in Seoul, and that he will be able to serve as a person of distinguished service to the Internet journal, and sent the Plaintiff to the Plaintiff on July 27, 2016, so that many unspecified visitors visiting the website can see the said letter.

However, the victim did not have been selected as a person of merit related to democratization 5.18.

Nevertheless, the defendant.