A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim C(59) are married married couple before 35 years.

On April 25, 2017, the Defendant, at around 02:30 on the grounds that the victim was unable to have the wind at the “E” restaurant operated by the Defendant, the Defendant: (a) had the victim prepared the restaurant business without her care; (b) had the victim prepared the restaurant business without her care; and (c) had the high static engine blade (24cm in total, the knife length and the knife length and the knife length of 24cm) with the victim’s knife with the knife and knife with the victim, followed the fact that the victim was winded by the winding of the victim; and (d) had the victim knife the victim, the victim did not seem to have any response; and (e) had the victim knife the victim’s knife so that the knife caused the injury to the left side of the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to C, F, and G;

1. On-site photographs, a detailed statement of the processing of the reported case, diagnostic certificate, each photograph, and a copy of medical record;

1. With respect to each investigation report (as to attachment of a diagnosis report to Victim C, with respect to attachment of this case’s knife photo), the application of the legislation shall apply.

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Confiscation Criminal Code is that the defendant, with a knife knife knife which is her husband, has inflicted an injury to his life, and the nature of the crime is not good in light of the law of crime.

However, the defendant was a first offender, and he had been living a marriage for 35 years, but he was aware of the fact that her husband was out of her husband, and there is a reason to consider the circumstance as a contingent crime that she committed in the process of following it.