1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, since Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act are the same as stated in the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the judgment is written or added as stated in paragraph (2).

The 5th day below the 4th day of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be subject to the 5th day of the judgment in the court of first instance as "D Witness of the court of first instance."

(b) 6. The following shall be added to the first instance court’s 8-9 “not”:

“A according to the images of evidence No. 29 and evidence No. 1, E is limited to only an act to the extent of being pushed ahead of the chair with the chair’s body until the wheel is left, and E is limited to an act to the extent of being pushed ahead of the chair’s body, and there is no violent inclination to the extent that he/she should urgently be faced with the chair, such as unloading an elevator door or exposing an chair to another person, but it is acknowledged that he/she committed an act, such as putting the face of a caregiver or exposing a food board, etc., while resisting from the commencement by three caregivers.”

(c)each “principal” of the sixth, 11, and 12th, 10, 600 judgments of the first instance court shall be made in the form of “tender” respectively;

The following shall be added to the sixth 15th sentence of the first instance court:

Rather, according to the statement No. 13 and the witness testimony of the first instance court, E’s act of violence was first committed on February 21, 2016, and since one night employee at the medical care center of this case ought to look at about about about 20 older persons, it can be recognized that the elderly with dementia symptoms was faced with imminent fear in order to prevent the outcoming of the elderly. Thus, it is deemed that the caregiver used violence to suppress the wheelchairs, which had been forced to go out of the wheelchairs, to efficiently manage E with symptoms of dementia.