beta
Text
1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the Plaintiff’s claim extended at the trial room, shall be modified as follows:
The defendant.
Reasons
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows. Thus, the reasoning for the court’s explanation is the same as that for the court of first instance, except for the addition or dismissal of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of
A. Around May 2016, the Plaintiff agreed on the premium of KRW 20 million at E and the place of business located in the real estate of this case. According to the appraisal by the appraiser F of the first instance trial, around September 21, 2016, around September 21, 2016, the instant real estate establishment premium of KRW 15 million is the premium of the instant real estate establishment.
G. Even after the termination of the instant lease agreement, the Plaintiff operated the instant real estate business by December 2, 2016, and subsequently closed the said lease agreement.
The judgment of the court of first instance added "B evidence Nos. 6 and 11 through 15 of the first instance appraiser F" in the part of the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance. Since the lease contract of this case was terminated in the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 13,520 won of the lease deposit of this case and the remaining 8,757,132 won after deducting the amount of 16,29,348 won deposited by the defendant from the amount of 25,00,000 won of the lease deposit of this case and the amount of 13,57,132 won of the lease deposit deposited by the defendant. According to the above facts as to the grounds of appeal No. 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the lease contract of this case was terminated on September 30, 2016, the amount of the lease deposit of this case should be deducted from the amount of the lease deposit of this case to the plaintiff 25,3136,15,29,257
(2) On December 2016, 2016, the first instance court's 5th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 14th 6th 6th 6th 14th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 14th 201.