logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2014.07.04 2013나22685
손해배상
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: the "development and capital" of No. 19 of the first instance court's decision No. 3, the "development and consultation" of No. 3, the "S. 7," the "S. 20," the "S. 7," and the "S. 20," the evidence submitted in the trial, which is insufficient to recognize the plaintiff's assertion that "the defendant corporation stated that it directly invested in the business of this case" is the evidence submitted in the court of the first instance, and it is identical to the reasons for the judgment of the first instance except for the rejection of each of the evidence No. 11-1, No. 11-2, 3, and 12, and therefore, it shall be cited

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants of this case is dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is justified in its conclusion, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow