1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows, with the exception of the rejection of the statements of Gap evidence Nos. 16 and 20 (including each number), which are not sufficient to recognize the plaintiff's assertion as evidence for additional documents submitted at the court of first instance, as stated in the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

“The Plaintiff alleged that he actually resided in the field of the trial of the political party from 1998 to 1998 and established G and worked in the above company. However, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize the above assertion, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it otherwise.”

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.