Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for each of the crimes set forth in the second sentence of 2014 and the second sentence of 2014 and the second sentence of 140, 225, 570 of this Court.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On May 2, 2003, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. and one year and one year of imprisonment at the Chuncheon District Court, and was released on February 28, 2004 during the execution of the above sentence, and the parole period expired on May 8, 2004. On July 9, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and two months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. in the original state branch of the Chuncheon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 15, 2009, and completed the execution of the sentence in the original state prison around June 2009.

【Criminal Facts】

"2014 Highest 46"

1. On March 19, 2007, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim C, stating that “The Defendant would pay 247,284,000 won and the above 40 million won as the cost of permission for gas station prior to the use of the profits earned from the operation of the saw factory, because the inside of the country was trying to build a saw factory in the Gun of Gangwon-do.” The Defendant borrowed 40,000,000 won as business funds.”

However, the defendant did not have any specific income or assets at the time, and did not prepare all land, funds, etc. that could build a fire-fighting unit factory, and there was no application for permission from the Crossing-gun, and thus, he did not have any intent or ability to repay the money even if he borrowed money from the victim as business funds.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 40 million won in total from the victim, including 20 million won on the same day under the pretext of borrowing from the victim, 5 million won on March 29, 2007, 13 million won on April 4, 2007, and 2 million won on April 30, 2007.

2. On April 11, 2007, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim C, stating that “The Defendant would transfer the name of the said gas station to the name of the mother of the relevant mother on the face of a State Party in the name of the mother of the State Party in the name of the State Party” (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 200 million won).

However, even if the defendant receives the above money from the victim, the defendant will or ability to transfer the name of the above gas station to the victim's mother's name.