A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

On September 15, 2005, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment of one year and six months with labor for a violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act, etc. by the District Court of the Republic of Korea on July 2, 2006, and the execution of the said sentence was terminated. On June 14, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with labor for fraud at the Jinyang District Court of the Republic of Korea on June 14, 2012 and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 13

1.(a)

Around November 29, 2007, the lease contract was terminated due to the failure to pay rent of at least 60 days from November 2, 2009 to April 8, 2010, while a lease contract was concluded with the effect that the ASEAN Capital Center in the name of C would use the ASEAN Capital Center (22,701,133 won) for 36 months in the name of C, and would pay monthly rent of 710,800 won while using the ASEAN Capital for 36 months at the ASEAN Capital Center in the third floor of the building in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Dongdaemun-gu, Dongdaemun-gu, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, and the ASEAN Capital Center in the name of C, and the said vehicle was embezzled by denying the return of the vehicle without justifiable grounds even after receiving a request from the victim company to return the vehicle along with the termination of the said lease contract.

B. A around March 17, 2008:

The lease contract was terminated from November 2, 2009 to 60 days after the victim Aju Capital Co., Ltd. received delivery of the above vehicle from the victim and used the vehicle for 1,031,500 won per month while using E-soca Code passenger car (acquisition price of KRW 42,617,210) in the location described in the port entry in C for 36 months. On April 8, 2010, even if the victim requested the return of the vehicle with the termination of the above lease contract, the above vehicle was embezzled by refusing to return the vehicle without any justifiable reason even though it was demanded by the victim company to return the vehicle with the termination of the above lease contract.

2.(a)

Around December 26, 2007, G Real Estate Office located in the F of Pakistan had no intent or ability to repay the money even if the money was borrowed from the victim, and there was no intention or ability to transfer the ownership of the real estate due to payment in kind. The victim H has leased KRW 40 million to the victim.