A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On July 17, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 15:35 on July 17, 2019, the Defendant her son D (year 56) and drinking in the Daegu Seo-gu Ccafeteria; (b) stated, “When the Defendant married a large number of children, he/she shall not send the Defendant to the surrounding people of the crogate; (c) the Defendant called, “I will not send the Defendant to the nearby people of the crogate”; and (d) the Defendant her head was a beer disease, which is a dangerous object on the table, and had the victim escape on the head of the victim.

In this respect, the defendant, carrying dangerous things, assaulted the victim, and inflicted an injury upon the victim in need of medical treatment for a certain number of days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of the Investigation Report (No. 4) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Scope of punishment by law: One to ten years of imprisonment;

2. The scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines [the determination of types] the special injury by special injury and repeated crime [the first category] special injury (the special person concerned] - the mitigated element: In cases of reduction of punishment (including serious efforts to recover damage) or considerable damage, [the scope of the recommended sentence and the scope of the recommended sentence] mitigation area, imprisonment for four months to one year [the scope of the corrected recommended sentence according to the applicable sentencing guidelines] for one year (the minimum limit of the sentencing range recommended by the sentencing guidelines is inconsistent with the statutory minimum limit of the applicable sentencing range, and so the minimum limit of the applicable sentencing range is inconsistent with the statutory minimum limit of the applicable sentencing range] (the person who has no general form of punishment];

3. The defendant for six months, who was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor, is not well aware of the fact that he was under probation, and committed the crime in this case, and the nature of the crime is poor and the risk of recidivism is high;

However, the defendant recognizes the crime of this case, and the defendant wishes to punish the defendant by mutual consent between the victim and the investigative agency.