logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.02.02 2016고단2186
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2016 Highest 2186]

1. On March 13, 2016, each Defendant, at his own house located in Gwangju-gu, Nam-gu, Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-si, using mobile phone text messages, wanting to maintain a monthly wage by imposing a performance-based burden of KRW 800,000,000 if the performance was reduced, the monthly wage would be deducted by KRW 80,000.

Then, with a loan of KRW 1 million, KRW 700,000,000 per share shall be paid in KRW 300,000,000,000 per share. There is a method of calculating credit rating by small-sum settlement method. However, the settlement of small-sum amount is extinguished at the end of the month, and it is not possible to understand it.”

However, the Defendant did not make a loan at all at the time, and when the injured party makes a settlement of small amount of money from the beginning, he/she received the money through the business operator of settlement of small amount and then received the money to the account of the injured party, and then received the money to be transferred to his/her account.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim, had the victim settle a small amount of money equivalent to 2.80,00 won in the form of a mobile phone, and then the company deducted the amount equivalent to 30% in the name of the fee, and then remitted the amount of 196,000 won to the account of the victim, the victim would be deemed as the cost of loan operations in the name of the victim and was remitted to the new bank account (Account Number E) in its name.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received property equivalent to KRW 196,00,00 from the victim, and had the victim provide property benefits equivalent to KRW 84,00,00,000 to the unrefilled settlement company, and had the victim receive the total of KRW 11,217,30,00 from the victim or provide the victim with the third party as shown in the attached list I.

[2016 Highest 3095]

2. The Defendant, on February 4, 2016, engaged in a clothing business partnership with the Defendant, who committed fraud, fabrication of private documents, and uttering of the above investigation documents.

arrow