logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.03.29 2016고단4364
특수협박등
Text

1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

However, the execution of the sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

seizure.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is (State) H operator who has been awarded a subcontract for interior construction at the construction site of the “G apartment site” located in Gyeyang-gu Seoul Metropolitan City F in the Gyeonggi-gu Gyeonggi-gu under this construction, and Defendant B is the H-general director above (State).

On April 19, 2016, when the Defendants received a decision to commence simplified rehabilitation procedures with respect to (State) H from the Seoul Central District Court on April 19, 2016, the Defendants were unable to receive some of the public fraud funds in the construction site despite being notified by E on June 17, 2016 of the termination of the construction subcontract. On June 23, 2016, the Defendants attempted to enter the construction site and exercise the right of retention on June 27, 2016, but came to the said construction site and came to know the possibility of exercising the right of retention.

In the end, under the above circumstances, the Defendants were able to look at the site office in the above construction site and call for the payment of the unpaid construction cost by avoiding disturbance by attaching gasoline rootss on their body and on the floor.

1. Around June 28, 2016, at the office located at the site site of the construction site, the Defendants put the gasoline, which is a dangerous object prepared in advance, on one hand, with the Defendants’ head, body, and the office floor, and put the straw up on one hand. If the victims I (the other, 53 years old), who is the director at the site of the construction site, did not know of the money, I would have to go to the string.

The term "the victim was frighten," and "the victim was frighten," as it was put into fire.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to threaten the victim by carrying dangerous goods.

2. During about 15 minutes a hour and 15 minutes at the date, time, and place under the above paragraph (1), the Defendants avoided disturbance, such as dusting the gasoline on the floor and threatening the victim (the captain of the site), and thereby, prevented the construction work at the above construction site from being carried out by police officers and fire officers.

arrow