logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.08.28 2014고단239
현존건조물방화예비
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five months.

Seized evidence 3 or 4 shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 19, 2013, the Defendant: (a) performed a game in “E” operated by the victim D in Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu; and (b) demanded a management employee whose name is unknown after the fact that “10,000 won is exchanged;” (c) but (d) was refused to request that “the remaining balance be exchanged in KRW 110,000,000.” (e.g., the above entertainment room.)

The Defendant purchased gasoline, and sent it to the entertainment room floor with a fire.

In addition, the Defendant purchased gasoline 1.5 litres from plastic disease in a gas station where the trade name in the vicinity of the above amusement room is unknown, and sought to remove gasoline 1.5 litres from F, a guest in the above amusement room, who was in the above amusement room at around 22:50 on the same day, and was found again in the above amusement room and was in his usual possession, and tried to minate the pertinent paint by spreading gasoline to the floor of the amusement room in advance. However, the Defendant was subject to removal from F, who was in the above amusement room.

Accordingly, the defendant prepared for the purpose of preventing a building in which people exist.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. The police seizure report and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to review the results of appraisal;

1. Articles 175 and 164 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts (the occupation of the existing building and the reserve for fire prevention);

1. The crime committed by the Defendant may cause serious human and material damage, and the crime is not good, and the defendant impairs the principle of non-detained judgment by failing to force the warrant of detention, such as the criminal records on the grounds of sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act (one time to suspend the sentence of this paper, one time to suspend the sentence of this paper), the fact that there is no particular criminal record since 1985, and the victim expressed his intention not to punish the Defendant at the time of investigation by the police. The Defendant attempted to shot-in-knick-in-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k

arrow