1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Basic Facts

On July 22, 201, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for the purchase of procurement commodities between the Plaintiff and the Public Procurement Service with the Public Procurement Service on July 2, 201, and ① a contract for the purchase of procurement commodities to supply 1.75 billion won (contract number 00160845-00), and 2.600 billion won of calcium ( content 74%) of 25 km per package to 1.35 billion won (contract number 0160852-00) to each end-user.

원고와 피고 사이의 염화칼슘 공급계약 체결 원고는 2011. 8. 31. 피고와 사이에, 피고가 원고와 조달청 사이의 위 조달물자 구매계약에 따른 염화칼슘 14,000톤을 원고를 대신하여 공급하고, 원고는 피고에게 물품대금 32억 5,050만 원(부가세 포함)을 지급하기로 하는, 다음과 같은 내용의 염화칼슘 공급계약을제1조(공급기간) 피고는 2011. 9. 1.부터 2011. 10. 31.까지 원고가 조달청과 계약한 염화칼슘 14,000톤(1톤빽(bag) 8,000톤/ 25kg 소포장빽 6,000톤)에 대하여, 책임지고 각 수요기관과의 계약기간 내에 납품 완료한다.

Article 2 (Supply Price and Settlement Method)

가. 피고는 1톤빽 8,000톤 × 227,700원 = 1,821,600,000원(부가세 포함)과 25kg 소포장빽 6,000톤 × 238,150원 = 1,428,900,000원(부가세 포함)으로 원고에게 공급한다.

Article 4 (Supply Methods)

A. The Defendant, on behalf of the Plaintiff, shall manage all the duties related to Piumium supply on behalf of the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff must send the written order to the Defendant each day as E-mail immediately after receipt of the written order.

was concluded.

In the case where the supply of the calium was conducted under the above contract, the Defendant demanded a price increase on the grounds of exchange rate fluctuation, etc., and the Plaintiff cancelled the contract for the supply of the calium as stated in the above paragraph (1) on November 15, 201, and settled the already received part, and then again, Article 1 (the Defendant’s supply period is 6,00 tons of the calium as to the calium 6,000 tons from November 16, 201 to December 10, 201.