The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal was that the Defendant did not slick the victim’s losses at the time of the instant case and did not take the mobile phone or the victim’s losses.

It is true that the victim was towed while getting out of the place of the defendant and getting out of the place of the defendant. However, even if the victim was in the process, it is not caused by the act of the defendant.

2. Determination:

A. The summary of the facts charged was around 09:50 on June 17, 2012, on the road in front of Seopopopo City, the Defendant brought a lawsuit against the Defendant’s leakage or the victim D (the age of 55) who was in the process of property inheritance, etc., and the victim took a cell phone by pushing the victim’s hand who was in the process of recording a cell phone with the victim’s cell phone, thereby cutting the cell phone into a cell phone. However, the Defendant took part in the victim’s left hand who tried to bring the cell phone at this time, and took part in the victim’s cell phone to bring the cell phone at this time, and took part in 10-20 meters of 10-20 meters of 10-day clothes and led the victim to approximately six-day medical treatment, and the loss by the 4-day left part of the outer side part of the road in front of Seopopopo City, and suffered the victim’s personal injury, e.g., e., knee., on the side coordinate.

B. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged.

C. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances revealed by the records of the judgment of the political party, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone took part in the victim’s left hand.

It is insufficient to recognize that the victim was injured by the victim or by leading the victim.

① Since the Defendant had consistently recorded the recording from the investigative agency to the trial at the time of the instant case, there was no reason to leave the victim’s recording on a mobile phone. G, a large discount of the Defendant, should first be called “the Defendant should have to keep the knives of the Defendant.”