logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2015.09.24 2015고단796
자동차관리법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a holder of the vehicle B. A.I. car.

1. No one who violates the Automobile Management Act shall forge or use a registration number plate under the Automobile Management Act;

From February 12, 2014 to March 2 of the same year, the Defendant: (a) at the front parking lot in front of the Defendant’s residence located in Gangseo-si; (b) the competent Gu office attached the front registration number plate in front of the said car on the grounds of the unpaid administrative fine; (c) when the Defendant’s competent office no longer is able to operate the said car; (d) forged the B registration number plate (the front number plate) in air-defensed by attaching it to the iron plate manufactured by the Defendant by attaching it to the iron plate manufactured by the Defendant; and (d) around 12:50 on April 12, 2015, the Defendant operated the car with the forged registration number plate at approximately 1k section from the front day of the making soup to the front road of the Gangseo-si city Gyeong-si.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged air defense, exercised forged air defense, and at the same time, forged a registration number plate in violation of the Automobile Management Act, and used a forged registration number plate.

2. On April 12, 2015, the Defendant was driving a B ice car without obtaining a driver’s license from a section of about 1 k meters from the front day of soup to the front day of the Gangseo-si Gyeongpo Road, which is located in the Gangseo-si Port on April 13:50, 2015.

3. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate any automobile on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated a passenger car set forth in Paragraph 2, which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the same time and place as the above Paragraph 2.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Seizure records;

1. The register of driver's licenses and mandatory insurance associations;

arrow