A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. 모욕 피고인은 2014. 12. 13. 23:40경 술을 마시고 인천 남구 B빌라 302호에 찾아가 개가 짖어 시끄럽다는 이유로 위 302호 현관문을 발로 걷어차는 등 소란을 피우고 때마침 문을 열고 나온 201호 주민과 말다툼 하던 중, 112 신고를 받고 출동한 인천남부경찰서 C지구대 소속 경사인 피해자 D, 경장인 피해자 E으로부터 이를 제지당하자 위 201호 주민 등이 듣고 있는 가운데 “야, 이 짭새 새끼들아, 빨리 따라와 봐, 이 개새끼들아, 야, 내가 세금을 꼬박 내고 있는데, 이 씹할 놈들아 너희가 그러냐, 개새끼들아”라고 큰 소리로 말하여 공연히 피해자들을 모욕하였다.

2. The Defendant was informed of the above date, time, and place of the obstruction of performance of official duties that he could be punished as a crime of insultd D by a slope, and that he could be punished as a crime of the obstruction of official duties from D, and that he could be punished as a crime of the obstruction of official duties again from D, and committed assault, such as “Obstruction of official duties, seeing, and spathing”, and breathing the breath of the said D with his hand, leading him to the corridor of the first floor, leading him to the corridor of the first floor, and causing him to be faced with the wall.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of police officers' order and criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. The application of recording records, documentary evidence and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively, for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;