1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of this court’s judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following dismissal portion, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 4

(1) In light of the evidence duly examined by the court of first instance, the fact finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justifiable, and there is no error as alleged by the plaintiff as the grounds for appeal). 2. Goon part of the judgment of the court of first instance, the permission to conduct the business listed in the attached list in the name of the plaintiff (hereinafter "instant permission to conduct the business of this case") under the name of the defendant "B" and the permission to conduct the business listed in the attached list in the name of the plaintiff (hereinafter "instant permission to conduct the business of this case")

On the second and third sides of the judgment of the court of first instance, in consideration of the economic situation of the defendant, the defendant turns to the plaintiff in consideration of the economic condition of the plaintiff "B".

In the judgment of the first instance, the first instance court deemed the Daegu District Court’s “Tgu District Court 2012Gahap7063” as the case.

1. The Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff”) implements the procedure for changing the name of the representative to the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant”) as the Defendant (the status in the instant conciliation is the Plaintiff; hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant”) regarding the permission to conduct the business listed in the separate sheet until September 21, 2012.

2. If the plaintiff fails to comply with the procedure for change of name mentioned in the above Paragraph (1), in addition to the above implementation, the plaintiff shall pay 62,00,000 won to the defendant as damages.

3. In order to implement the procedure for change of name as described in paragraph (1) above, the Plaintiff and the Defendant are to reach an agreement with the Department of Sanitation in the Gohap-gun Office of Gohap-gun on September 20, 2012. If the Defendant did not appear at the above time and place, the agreement on the payment of the amount stated in paragraph (2) above shall be null and void.

4. The defendant shall waive the remaining claims.

5. The costs of lawsuit and the costs of mediation shall be borne respectively;

The third to fourth to fourth of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows.