1. The Defendant’s KRW 104,650,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 6% per annum from August 22, 2016 to November 29, 2016 for the Plaintiff.

1. Fact and determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the purport of each statement in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7, on January 22, 2016, the plaintiff entered into a contract for the design of a building ("the design contract of this case") with the defendant 230,000 won for the long-term pro rata 135-5, 135-8 pro rata 40,000,000 won for the above 6,512 square meters for the site area, the first-class and second-class neighborhood living facilities, second-class and second-class structures of ground, structure congested structure, period of performing design work from January 22, 2016 to August 1, 2016 (the scope of the contract, ② the plan design drawings and specifications, ③ the plan design drawings and specifications of the building, third-class 40,000,000,0000,000,0000,000,000 won for the above construction work, 5,016,3.

B. According to the above facts, the plaintiff completed both interim design documents (a license and a permit use document) and authorization and permission agency among the business subject to the design contract of this case. Thus, the defendant, barring any special circumstance, completed the design contract of this case, 92 million won for the supply of interim design documents (a permit) according to the design contract of this case and value-added tax 92 million won for them.