logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.05.11 2017구단64265
추가상병일부승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. From March 19, 1977 to March 31, 2008, the Plaintiff served as an auxiliary coal support unit at the Korea Coal Corporation Korea Coal Corporation from March 19, 197 to the Korea Coal Corporation.

B. The plaintiff is the above A.

If there was an ex post facto disease in both sides by performing duties that are to be borne by the body while serving in the basin mining center, as described in the paragraph, the Defendant applied for medical care benefits to the Defendant, and the Defendant approved on June 8, 2015.

C. The plaintiff is the above A.

The defendant applied for an additional injury and disease to the defendant on December 9, 2016, when both sides of the water station have taken place, as described in paragraph (1), as well as when both sides have taken charge of the duties to be borne by the body during the work in the basin mining center, and there was an outbreak of a power failure of both sides, and the defendant applied for an additional injury and disease to the defendant. However, on December 9, 2016, the defendant was recognized as an additional injury and disease because the total power failure of both sides was related to the duties, and thus, he cannot be recognized as an additional injury and disease due to the lack of a causal relationship with the duties due to the decline of the right dog.

(2) The grounds for recognition are as follows: (a) the fact that there is no dispute; (b) the entry of the evidence Nos. 1, 5, and 11, and the purport of the entire pleadings; and (c) the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion is clear that the plaintiff carried out the duty to bear the physical burden while serving in the Korea Resources Agency, and that the injury or disease in this case occurred.

Therefore, the instant disposition issued on a different premise should be revoked as it is unlawful.

B. Determination Gap's evidence Nos. 4, 9, 10, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the overall purport of the arguments as a result of the written request for the examination of medical records to the head of Seoul Hospital affiliated with the Macheon-do University of the Republic of Korea, can be seen as follows, i.e., the revolving of the revolving one's daily life without any special credit.

arrow