logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2016.06.15 2015가합103387
건물명도
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B Co., Ltd.:

2. Obstructions in the list of obstacles Nos. 1 to 29.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The execution of the general industrial complex development project and the expropriation of land, etc. 1) Kimpo-si General Industrial Complex Development Project and Kimpo-si Kimpo-si Ltd. (hereinafter “Spo-si”)

[C General Industrial Complex](6th)(hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”) in Kimpo-si.

The Gyeonggi-do Governor approved an industrial complex plan pursuant to Article 15(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Simplification of Authorization and Permission Procedures for Industrial Complexes, and the Gyeonggi-do Governor publicly announced the said project as Gyeonggi-do’s announced D ( April 8, 2013), Gyeonggi-do’s notified E ( September 10, 2013), Gyeonggi-do notified F ( June 5, 2014), Gyeonggi-do notified G ( July 17, 2014), Gyeonggi-do notified H ( April 21, 2015).

1. Attached Form owned by each real estate listed in the real estate list (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”) and Defendant B (hereinafter “B”)

2. In order to acquire each obstacle in the list of obstacles (hereinafter “each obstacle in this case”), the Defendants consulted with the Defendants, but did not reach an agreement due to differences in the amount of compensation, etc., the Plaintiff filed an application for adjudication with the Local Land Tribunal of Gyeonggi-do.

3) On July 27, 2015, the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal rendered a ruling of expropriation (transfer) with respect to each of the instant real estate and each of the obstacles, etc. on September 10, 2015; on September 10, 2015, Defendant A’s land compensation amounting to KRW 2,321,714,660; on August 31, 2015, “The property compensation amount of Defendant A is KRW 1,427,496,010; the property compensation amount of Defendant B was corrected to KRW 1,815,346,440.” The non-party company paid compensation for losses due to the expropriation and correction ruling to the Defendants.

(2) Acceptance under Article 45 (the date of commencement before September 1, 2015).

arrow