beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 5,00,00 for each of the Plaintiff A, Plaintiff B, and C, and its related thereto, respectively; and (b) from March 21, 2014 to March 2015.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. At around 18:50 on March 21, 2014, the Defendant: (a) went ahead of the “F” in Ulsandong-gu E; (b) was under the influence of alcohol, and (c) was fluencing Plaintiff A, who was dissatisfied with drinking with drinking expenses at a restaurant near the place; (d) was flucing Plaintiff A’s brucing, sping, pushing with, and sping Plaintiff A’s ebbbbbb with each other with his hand; and (e) continued to go beyond the floor of Plaintiff A, the Defendant she sphered Plaintiff A’s neck with his own left arms on the back of his ship; and (e) was flucing Plaintiff A with his desire to spherbling Plaintiff A with his hair, and sphering Plaintiff A with his hair, thereby causing damage to Plaintiff A’s ebbbbbbing Plaintiff A’s ebbbb, etc., leading Plaintiff A to 2 to park.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant crime”). (b)
As a result of the instant crime, the Defendant was sentenced on November 28, 2014 to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and two years of suspended execution as Ulsan District Court 2014Gohap285, and the said judgment became final and conclusive around that time.
C. Plaintiff B and C are Plaintiff A’s children.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The plaintiffs' assertion and judgment
A. The plaintiffs asserted that the defendant is entitled to pay the plaintiff A's medical expenses of KRW 18,904,134, nursing expenses of the plaintiff A, KRW 38,830,000, and the compensation for mental damages of KRW 50,000,000, KRW 15,000,000, and delay damages of the plaintiff A, which were paid to the defendant due to the crime of this case.
B. According to the facts of the occurrence of liability and the recognition of the above limitation, the defendant is liable for damages suffered by the plaintiffs as a tortfeasor who injured the plaintiff Gap.
However, the error of the plaintiff A, who was the defendant and Si expenses, also the accident of this case.