logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2013.05.09 2012고단3602
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

The defendant is 10,00,000 won, and F, an applicant for compensation, to C, who is an applicant for compensation.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At the time of 2010, the Defendant was at least KRW 10 million, and the amount of bonds was at least KRW 300,000 to KRW 40,000, and was in bad credit standing. The Defendant did not have any particular property. The Defendant did not think that the Defendant would have any profit by investing in the real estate and investing in the real estate. Therefore, even if the victims received money from the victims, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay the principal and interest.

In addition, since all the money received from victims after 2010 was used as a return for the repayment of principal and interest, the defendant's obligation continues to increase.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings victims to take money as follows.

Even if the Defendant received money from the victim J, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the principal and interest on the remainder of the profit, and said, around July 2, 2010, the Defendant said that the victim’s house located in M of the Jeonbuk-gun, “it may have a large amount of profit by investing in the real estate at home,” and that the victim would pay the principal and interest within one month of the payment.”

The Defendant, as seen above, deceiving the victim by falsehood, and received KRW 25 million from the victim under the pretext of the ordinary investment in the city, from that time until June 27, 2012, the Defendant, as indicated in the “J Crime List,” which was issued five million won in total, from that time, obtained at five hundred and fifty million won as indicated in the “crime List,” which was obtained from the victim.

B. Even if the Defendant received money from the victim L, the defrauded did not have an intent or ability to pay the principal and interest remaining with the profit, even if he/she did not have an intent or ability to obtain the said money, he/she called that the victim made a telephone call to the victim on October 25, 2010, that the victim would be 5% of the monthly amount of profit if he/she had an investment in real estate with high-profit profits.

The Defendant is as above.

arrow