(영문) 대구지방법원 안동지원 2017.07.21 2017고단235

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 안동지원 2017.07.21 2017고단235

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등

Text

1. The imprisonment without prison labor for a defendant shall be determined as one year;

2. Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final;

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a rocketing car.

On November 15, 2016, the Defendant driving the above vehicle at around 07:30 on a permanent basis, and driving the road at a point of 100 meters from the bend, which is about 113 km at the speed, at the time of the permanent residence of the Si, at the location of a permanent residence of the Si.

Since there is a situation in which the visible distance is within 100 meters due to the opening at the time, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to operate safely by reducing speed of not more than 40 km per hour of not more than 50 km per hour, a speed of not more than 80 km per hour, a speed of not more than 50 km per hour, and by properly operating the steering gear and operating the steering gear and operating the steering gear in a manner that well examines the steering and the right

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so, while driving at a speed exceeding 73 km per hour due to a traffic accident with D Cargo, and was driven by the victim E (62 east) of the FIstren driveed by the Defendant with the front part of the FIstren vehicle in the front part of the FIstren vehicle in the front part of the FIstren vehicle, with the said FIstren vehicle being pushed ahead by the front part of the FIstren vehicle in the front part of the vehicle. After being driven by the said FIstren vehicle in the front part of the vehicle, the Defendant was driven by the victim G (54 ) who was stopped due to the traffic accident with the said cargo, and then was driven by the Defendant with the front part of the front part of the FIstren vehicle in the front part of the FIstren vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, at the above occupational negligence, caused the death of the above E from the malutic malutic mar, resulting from the malutic marization and damage, and suffered injury from the injury of the above G, i.e., the marc marc marc mar, the fele mar, the mare mar, the mare mar, the mar, and the mar mar.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to I, J, K, and G;

1. Each letter of L, M, N,O, P, Q and R 1.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.06.28 2017고단611

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.07.18 2018고단2149

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.03.16 2016고단2883

-부산지방법원 2017.02.09 2016고단7394

-의정부지방법원 2018.11.13 2018고단2732