1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for cases where the court cites or adds it as follows. Thus, it is citing it as it is by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Completioned Parts]

A. On the fourth sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance, following the 10th sentence, the portion of the “V is a senior citizen aged 72 at the time of 2012,” “V is an senior citizen aged 78 years old at the time of 2012 (the age of 72 years old at the time of resident registration).”

B. No. 7 of the first instance judgment, the part of the Defendant’s “Defendant” was cited as “Defendant’s”.

[Supplementary Parts]

A. On the 6th anniversary of the judgment of the court of first instance, the following is added.

The defendant asserts to the effect that V did not receive a clinical diagnosis of dementia or receive a dementia treatment. The defendant did not have been notified in advance from the plaintiffs, and even if there was a dementia symptoms to V at the time of home, V's disappearance is not caused by the V's dementia symptoms, but intentionally planned by the plaintiff Nevisa, and therefore, there was no causation between V's dementia symptoms and V's disappearance, and the defendant does not have a duty to compensate the plaintiffs.

According to the evidence No. 10 No. 10, the patient card attached to V's beds in the instant hospital refers to the name of "SDH, de facto Dementia, or recognition disorder."

The Defendant’s assertion that there was no dementia symptoms, or that the Defendant was unaware of the dementia symptoms of V is without merit. Moreover, the evidence submitted by the Defendant alone is insufficient to recognize the Defendant’s assertion that the missing of V was intentionally planned by the Plaintiff who was the Plaintiff argue, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit. (b) Of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance court, the part regarding “the judgment of the Defendant on the Defendant’s argument” as follows.

The defendant shall file for objection.