The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the gist of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the fact that “D” products sold by the Defendant are not harmful foods, not harmful foods, and there is no record of crime, but a fine is imposed by the lower court by significantly reducing the fine amount of the summary order in consideration of the above circumstances. In order to promote national health by providing correct information on foods, there is a need to strictly punish a violation of the Acts and subordinate statutes regarding labels and advertisements, the period and sale of the Defendant’s sale, the age, sex, environment, circumstances of crimes, etc., and various sentencing conditions indicated in the arguments, such as the records and arguments, the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. Accordingly, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is groundless.