Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Criminal facts

Defendant

A is equipped with 9 marina rooms, shower rooms, one female employees waiting room, and six CCTV rooms in light-to-face C building, and operates "D," a commercial sex acts business establishment, E is an employee of the above business establishment, and Defendant B is a person employed in the above business establishment and engaged in commercial sex acts, and Defendant B is a person related to the above A.

Defendant

A around June 30, 2016, around June 30, 2016, the defendant B attempted to arrange commercial sex acts, such as calculating so that commercial sex acts can be achieved at the above business establishment, providing guidance to customers, etc.

Defendants of the same year

7.1. At around 19:00, Defendant B received 130,000 won in cash from the visitors who visited the said place, and provided them with a sexual intercourse with the above E at the place. Defendant A employed the above E and provided it to the said place of sexual traffic.

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A written self-written statement of E;

1. Report on internal investigation and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing photographs of suspected soldiers;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., Article 19 (2) 1 of the Criminal Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively, concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code does not have a significant number of records of punishment against Defendant A; Defendant B had the same record of punishment, but all the Defendants were led to confession and reflect, the Defendants did not have any record of punishment exceeding the fine, and the number of days the Defendants operated jointly is only

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection, etc. of Social Service Orders