A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the relationship between the victim C (V, 29 years of age) and around seven months from April 2014 to October 201 of the same year and the relationship heed.

1. On June 4, 2017, around Seoul Special Metropolitan City and around 23:32, the Defendant, using smartphones, saying, “I have a large number of answers, I have a lot of answers, I have a lot of answers, I have no choice but to have you want to be able to be able to be able to live a plenary marriage life in the past,” and “I have no choice but to ignore the date;

It is satisfied that the important photograph has been crossed out and restored to the restoration, but it is satisfactory that the husband's her husband's relationship is good. From now to now, the message and the victim's photograph sent to the bed on the bed of the bed of the bed of the bed of the bed of the bed of the beingd of the beingd of the beingd of the beingd of the beingd of the beingd of the beingd of the beingd of the beingd of the beingd of the beingd of the beingd of the beingd.

To this end, it is difficult to loan the money back to us, so far as it is difficult to loan the money back to us, and it is not waiting to send a few photographs that continue to be unreshed and neglected, so that it can not be waiting to send several photographs.”

The message shall be sent up to 13:59 June 5, 2017, from that time, from the time to June 14, 2017, to approximately 44 times, i.e., the list of offenses (1) of [Attachment 1].

If the victim does not know 2 million won, the defendant threatened her husband or her husband of the b body photograph taken with the victim during the teaching system.

On June 5, 2017, the Defendant received transfer of KRW 2 million from a national bank account (Account Number D) in the name of the Defendant from a person suffering from a frighting damage.

2. On June 9, 2017, the Defendant attempted to commit an attacked act: (a) around 23:21, 201, at an influent place in Seoul and below, in the same manner as that of paragraph 1, prevented the Defendant from putting bonds with the past money.