Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won and by imprisonment of 1 year for each of the defendants B.

Defendant

A The above fine shall be imposed.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person engaged in the vicarious driving, and the defendant B is the co-manager of the Damball Team and the E police station.

1. Defendant A introduced F, a high-speed line F, to have a substitute driving part-time at H where B in Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, the head of which works as the head of the department.

On May 30, 2013, B, as indicated in paragraph (a) of Article 2, driven a rocketing vehicle, which was shocked by the street trees located in the central separation zone, and left the site without any measure, even though the said street trees were cut down and the said vehicle was listed in the central separation zone.

At around 16:00 on June 17, 2013, the Defendant knew of the fact that the above crime was committed by the Defendant, the Defendant made a false statement with I, as if the Defendant had caused a traffic accident, to the police officer belonging to the above police station who is investigating the case at the guard and traffic of the Chungcheongnam-west Police Station and the traffic investigation team office.

In the end, the defendant had a person who committed a crime subject to a fine or heavier punishment escape.

2. Defendant B

A. On May 30, 2013, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol around 04:00, driven a Jworking car, and proceeded with a three-lane road in front of the Sungcheon-dong Employment Center in Seocheon-dong, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-do, in the direction of a designated shooting distance at the slunebb, at the ethbbb, at an insular speed.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to live well before and after the vehicle, and to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brake system of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and caused the roadside trees in front of the defendant's vehicle in the central separation zone due to the negligence of the defendant's negligence, and caused the above street trees to be cut off and the defendant's vehicle was up to the central separation zone.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence in the course of performing the above duties.