Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a C-si.

On March 21, 2018, the Defendant driving the above taxi on March 21, 2018, and driving the two-lane road in the front direction of the E in the following cities in the following cities, along the first lane in the direction of Samsung Bio-resources, led to an illegal internship.

At all times, the center line of yellow solid lines is installed, and crosswalks without signal lights are installed on the front side. Therefore, the Defendant engaged in driving service had a duty of care to observe the wheel and brakes by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brakes, and to ensure pedestrians' attention and safe driving.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the victim F (the age of 63) who crossed the crosswalk in the direction of the network in the direction of the network, due to the negligence of making an illegal intern in the crosswalk, went beyond the floor by taking the victim F (the age of 63) who was crossing the crosswalk in the direction of the network in the direction of the network.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as a ductal pelle, which requires approximately 10 weeks of medical treatment, due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. Report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, report on the actual condition of the accident, report on the investigation, photograph related to the accident, report on the investigation (in cases where the Central Line is invaded, and the obligation to protect pedestrians is applied) and the application of Acts

1. Relevant Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Special Cases concerning the Selection of Punishment; Article 3 (2) 2 and 6 of the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents; Article 268 of the Criminal

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The offense is serious and is not good because it was committed by negligence as it was committed to the injured party on the crosswalk while breaking the central line of the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act with regard to the order to provide community service and attend lecture, and the person who is walking on the crosswalk was able to wear up.

The degree of injury suffered by the victim is very serious.

The defendant has been subject to three times or a fine for the same kind of crime.

(b) a victim;