Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

At around 23:40 on February 8, 2015, Defendants were arguing with the said singing room business as a matter of Domination in the “Enogle” located in Ansan-si, Annsan-si, the said sing room business owner, received 112 report from the said singing room business owner that the Defendant’s daily operation cost was incurred, and asked questions about the circumstances of the instant case. Defendant A her talked that “I am back, I am back, this son son son son, this son son son, this son son son, this son son son son, this son son son son son son son, this son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son, and Defendant B her body threatened Defendant A with the said son’s chest son’s chest son son son.”

Accordingly, the police officers dispatched to the scene arrested Defendant A as a flagrant offender in the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties and attempted to board the patrol vehicle, Defendant B obstructed the front of the police officers, and obstructed the police officers from carrying Defendant A with the intent of carrying them on the patrol vehicle.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to commit violence or intimidation against the victims who are police officers, thereby hindering the victims from performing their duties of reporting 112.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police officer's statement of I, J, H and G;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Articles 136 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the ordinary concurrences;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act for the suspension of execution (such as the confessions and reflects of the defendants, the previous fact to the defendants A, and the fact that there is no penalty power exceeding the fine to the defendants B).