logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2014.01.08 2013고단2174
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a BM3 car.

On September 20, 2013, the Defendant driven the said car on September 20, 2013, while driving it, and driving the two-lane road in the Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the next two-lane road of the department store at the speed of about 40 km from the direction of the Shirgian street to the direction of new disease control.

There is an intersection where signal lights are installed, and there is a crosswalk where signal lights are installed in front of about 50 meters in front of the front line, so the person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to check whether there is a person who gets on a way to reduce speed and see well the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the duty of care to drive safely in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, by neglecting this, the Defendant neglected and proceeded as it was, disregarded that the vehicle progress signal is changed to the stop signal, and found the victim C (32 years old), the victim D (30 years old), and the victim E (38 years old) who cross the crosswalk from the right side of the crosswalk to the left side of the crosswalk pursuant to the pedestrian signals. However, the Defendant did not avoid the situation and did not go beyond the ground of the victim's left side bridge.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim C, such as catum d and catum d, which require approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim C by occupational negligence as above, for approximately seven weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Each written statement C, D, and E;

1. A traffic accident report (1) (1)

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution ( normal consideration of the reasons for the suspension of execution);

1. Order to attend a lecture and order to attend a lecture;

arrow