logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.10.23 2019고단3025
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for four months, respectively.

, however, the defendant from the date of this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle CK5.

On April 6, 2019, the Defendant driven the above car on April 13:40, 2019, and proceeded along the three-lanes between the three-lanes in the written intersection in 722-2 as the center of the Busan Jin-gu, Busan.

Since there is an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, there was a duty of care to safely drive a person engaged in driving service in accordance with the signals by reducing speed and checking the right and the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded as it is by negligence, disregarding that the vehicle driving signal is a stop signal, and thereby, was driven by the victim B(24 years old) driving in violation of the stop signal from the left side of the Defendant’s driving direction to the right side, and received the front part of the victim B(24 years old) driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by the above occupational negligence, the injury of the victim B, such as the openness of pulverization of flaging the right side, which requires approximately 14 weeks of medical treatment, and the victim D (the age of 35) who was accompanied by the said car, with approximately 20 days of medical treatment.

2. Defendant B is a person who is engaged in driving service of 530CC.

At around 13:40 on April 6, 2019, the Defendant driven the above Oral Ba which was not covered by mandatory insurance, and led the Defendant to drive the Oral Ba along the three-lanes of the written intersection in 722-2 as at the center of Busan Jin-gu, Busan, along the three-lanes of the three-lane.

Since there is an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, there was a duty of care to safely drive a person engaged in driving service in accordance with the signals by reducing speed and checking the right and the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and the vehicle progress signal is a stop signal.

arrow