Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months, and imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.

However, this judgment is delivered to Defendant A.

Criminal facts

Defendant

B and Defendant A are women, and Victim E (Age 83) is the father of Defendant B and the husband of Defendant A.

Defendant

B had been missing since 10 years before her husband was missing, and had been provided with economic support by finding the family of the victim E, and had been able to do so by the clan of the said victim, and the property of the said victim was investigated.

Defendant

B은 다른 형제자매들이 바빠서 부모를 자주 찾아뵙지 못하는 동안 분별력이 약해져 자신의 말만 듣게 된 피고인 A와 공모하여, 피해자 E 소유의 화성시 F 임야 23,207㎡ 중 1/16 지분 검사는 화성시 F 임야 23,207㎡ 전체가 피해자 E의 소유라고 공소제기하였으나, 위 임야에 대한 토지등기부 등본의 기재(증거기록 제25~31면)에 의하면 위 임야 중 1/16 지분만 위 피해자의 소유임이 명백하므로, 위와 같이 정정한다. ,

The same G forest land G 992 square meters was assigned to a housing site creation project implemented by H Corporation and the victim would suffer, while forcing the above victim to divorce with the defendant A, and in turn, he did not pay the above victim's property as a penalty through a property division consultation.

The defense counsel argues that the facts charged of this case stated that "the defendant B tried to get a divorce with the victim E by suspicioning the defendant A who did not think of divorce, and to account for the property owned by the above victim." However, the written indictment of this case merely stated that "the defendant B conspired with the defendant A to force the victim E to divorce with the defendant, and let the victim E deducted the above victim's property," and it appears that there is no content like the defense counsel's assertion.

1. On July 1, 2010, the Defendants’ forgery of the certificate of seal imprint and the Defendant A’s use of the certificate are on the proxy form kept at the Idong Office around 13:00.