Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and for six months, respectively.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 18, 2013, the Defendants stated that “Around April 18, 2013, the first floor of the Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F-gu Office in the G-gu G-gu Office in which the Defendants were operating, “The Defendants are running the business of supplying I to the Ministry of National Defense, which would be able to supply I to the Ministry of National Defense through the connection, and the Defendants would pay 50 million won to the Ministry of National Defense as deposit to secure their fees.”

However, in fact, the I project of the Ministry of National Defense was conducted as a pilot project in 2014, and the I project was conducted by competitive bidding, so there was no intention or ability to allow the defendants to proceed with the I project of the Ministry of National Defense through the connection of the Ministry of National Defense.

On June 3, 2013, the Defendants conspired to induce the victim and received KRW 50 million from the injured party to the new bank account (J) in the name of the G Bank in the name of the G Bank Resolution Co., Ltd. on a deposit basis.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the suspect against the defendant B (limited to the defendant B);

1. A copy of a name box, a certificate of all the matters to be registered (K), a statement of business cooperation and understanding, a certificate (a written agreement on deposit), a certificate of all the matters to be registered (G), and a written agreement on the refund of deposit;

1. In the investigation report (the statement by the National Defense Facility Headquarters L.) (the Defendants and their respective defense counsel, first of all, the instant contract is a business agent to enable M to enter into a contract with the I company including the Ministry of National Defense, and the Defendants actually performed their best business agent to enter into a contract with N to enter into a contract of KRW 400,000 with the N, so Defendant A did not deceiving the victim.

On the other hand, there is a statement in the investigative agency of the victim and this court that corresponds to the deception among the facts charged in this part.

According to the following facts and circumstances, the statements of the victim may be trusted and the fact of deception shall be recognized.

(e).