logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.01.13 2016가합1119
건물명도
Text

1. The defendant shall deliver to the plaintiff each building listed in the separate sheet.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

(a) The total amount of deposit (60 months) from September 1, 2015 to August 31, 2020 (the expiration date of use) from September 1, 2015, including the conclusion of a lease contract: The remainder of deposit of KRW 1,200,000,000 won: May 30, 2015, the monthly rent of KRW 25,000 (VIT separate) was paid on May 30, 2015; the first payment date of rent of KRW 25,00,000 (VIT separate): the lease contract of KRW 326,26, public use of KRW 780, Dec. 12, 200 (hereinafter “A”); the lease contract of KRW 1,200,000,000,0000, which was paid on May 30, 2015; the lease contract of this case was concluded between the respective parties to the lease contract of this case and the Defendant (hereinafter “A”).

Article 20 (Termination of Contract) (1) In any of the following cases, where Eul falls under any of the following subparagraphs, Gap may demand Eul to implement the contract within a reasonable period of time (within ten days) or may terminate this contract if Eul requests Eul to correct his/her breach of duty within such reasonable period of time, and if Eul fails to comply with such demand within such period of time, and in such cases, Eul shall not raise any objection:

1. The Plaintiff and the Defendant: (a) each of the buildings listed in the separate sheet on April 24, 2015 (hereinafter “each of the buildings of this case”) on April 24, 2015.

2) As to the following lease agreement (hereinafter “instant contract”).

(2) On April 24, 2015, the Plaintiff delivered each of the instant buildings to the Defendant, and the Defendant paid KRW 200,000,000 on April 27, 2015.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including a provisional number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded the instant lease agreement on the grounds of the claim.

arrow