Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

On July 29, 2017, at around 00:50, the Defendants reported that there was a drinking level in the “E main store” located in the Da, Ma, and 2nd floor, and Defendant A called the above police officers to the slope G and H, and Defendant A called the above police officers to the right h when: (a) the head was taken several times while she takes a bath for the same rings of this disease; (b) G and H’s chests in hand; and (c) Defendant B, in combination with the above police officers, opened the hump to the right hump by “Is, gys, kis, kis, fys, and fys, fys, fys, fys, fys, fys, fys, fys, fys, and fys,” and (d) Defendant A put into the right hum.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to perform their legitimate duties on the handling of 112 reported cases by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to H, G, and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by cutting on the spot photographs and video images;

1. Defendants of the relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act

1. Tradeal concurrent defendants: Articles 40 and 50 of each Criminal Act (Punishments imposed on a person who has heavier penalty than that of a crime)

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant A who observe the protection and observation: The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The records of this case, including the fact that Defendant A's criminal act is recognized and wrong, the police officer G and H do not want the punishment of the Defendant, and the degree of violence committed by the Defendant, etc., and the fact that the Defendant was subject to criminal punishment, including imprisonment and criminal punishment. However, there have been a history of having been subject to the suspended sentence of imprisonment for the same crime, and other disadvantageous conditions, including the fact that the Defendant suffered from long-term illness, and the risk of recidivism, should be continuously treated.