A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than eight months and by imprisonment for not more than four months for the crimes of No. 1 and No. 2 of the judgment of the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On February 22, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a period of eight months of imprisonment for fraud at the Gangnam Branch of the Chuncheon District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on March 3, 2017.

[Criminal facts] 2017 Highest 292

1. On July 11, 2016, the Defendant stated that the victim D would send KRW 50,000,000 to the victim D, including that until July 21, 2016, at around KRW 50,00,000, to the 13 victim D’s opening of the business of Jeju-do Fudio-gu, where the victim attempted to start of the business.

However, in fact, the Defendant was unable to secure 13 female entertainment loans that can move to the main point in Jeju-do, and the money received from the victimized person was planned to be used as an individual debt repayment, etc., and thus, there was no intention or ability to have the victimized person work at the entertainment place operated by the victimized person during the time limit that the injured person promised to receive money from the injured person.

The Defendant received KRW 6,800,000 on the same day from the one bank account (Account Number G) account in the name of the Defendant, and received KRW 50,000,000 on July 12, 2016, in total, from the remittance of KRW 43,200,000 on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. The Defendant committed the crime against the victim H by telephone to the victim H at a place in which the police officer was not located in the city of Gangwon-gu, Gangwon-do, Gangwon-do, on February 2, 2017.

2. From mid to mid-to long-term A.C. 5, the president made a false statement to the effect that he/she will work at the I’s main point operated by the National Assembly.

However, even if the defendant receives money from the injured party due to the work performed by another company, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to perform the work at the entertainment shop operated by the injured party by the promised time limit.

The Defendant, on February 9, 2017, is the victim of the damage.