1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On February 6, 2014, the deceased B (C life, male, and the deceased) was a person working as a prison officer in charge of the general affairs of the D prison and a correctional officer in charge of the purchase (rank: the class); and on February 6, 2014, at the time of receiving goods purchased by prisoners from suppliers and verifying and classifying the state of the goods. At around 08:00, at around 08:30, the deceased was found to have been employed by the staff in the toilet and transferred to the 119 first-lane hospital, but around 09:03 on the same day, the deceased on the same day.

(hereinafter “instant death accident”). B.

In the body autopsy report on the deceased, the private person is written as “unexplosion,” and the body autopsy report on the deceased is written by the private person as “pactical fluorial fluorial fluor and its subsequent heart pressure.”

C. On April 1, 2014, the Plaintiff’s spouse: (a) filed a claim with the Defendant for the payment of bereaved family’s compensation under Article 61 of the Public Officials Pension Act on the ground that the instant death accident occurred due to an excessive course of performing official duties or stress; (b) on April 28, 2013, the Defendant rendered a decision on the compensation for survivors’ compensation (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that “In light of the medical characteristics and cause of the deceased’s death; (c) details of the deceased’s duties and details of overtime work; (d) the health examination conducted in 2012 and 2013, the result of autopsy, etc., there is no causal relationship between the deceased’s death and public duties.”

The Plaintiff, who is dissatisfied with the instant disposition, filed the instant lawsuit on June 23, 2014.

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap's 1 through 6, 10, 15, entry of Eul's 1 through 3, purport of whole pleadings]

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion may eventually result in the instant death accident due to stress caused by frequent work hours, frequent night, excessive work, and stress caused by computer operation technology failure, etc.

Nevertheless, the defendant does not have to do so.