logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.12.23 2014구단31524
국가유공자 등록거부처분 등 취소청구
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff entered the Army on May 24, 201, and was discharged from military service on February 27, 2012.

B. The Plaintiff sleeped a blurgical slurgical slurgical slurgical slurgical slurgic slurgic slurgic slurgic slurgic slurgic slurgic slurgic slurgic slurgic slurgic slurgic slurgic slurgic slurgic slurgic slurgic slurgic slurgic slurgic slurgic slurgic slurgic slurgic slurgic slurgic slurgics

C. On May 27, 2013 after the Plaintiff was discharged from active service, the Plaintiff applied for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State by applying for “vertebrates, spine electric ebrates, and spine ebrate ebrates” to the Defendant. However, on October 22, 2013, the Defendant rendered the instant disposition to non-conformity with the requirements for persons who rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation and notify the Plaintiff thereof on the ground that it is difficult to recognize the instant wounds to have been developed or deteriorated due to the military performance

On January 16, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal, but was dismissed on June 3, 2014.

[Ground of recognition] The entry of Gap evidence No. 1 and the purport of the whole argument

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion was conducted on September 12, 2006 on the basis of “the following bluriation” in the family department, but the following bluriation among the name of the sick listed at the time is one of the bluriation of body, which is irrelevant to the bluriization in 2012, and is irrelevant to the bluriization of spine in the year 2012. In addition, on August 4, 201, the records of outpatients, and on January 18, 2012, the records of the in-patients, stating that “at all times before being admitted, it shall not be considered as a disease, and shall be deemed that there was a bluriation of the bluriation of body, and shall be expressed as the advice.

arrow