1. The Defendant’s KRW 5,605,300 as well as annual 5% from May 20, 2015 to November 10, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

1. The facts subsequent to the facts of recognition do not conflict between the parties, or may be acknowledged by taking account of the whole purport of the pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence 2, Gap evidence 3-1 to 3.

On November 29, 2014, the Defendant committed assault to the Plaintiff by “D” in front of the main point of “Seoul-gu, Incheon-gu, the main point of which was “A”, “I must go to the head of the said main point,” “I have to go to the head of the said main place,” “I have to go to go to the head of the said main place,” “I have satched the Plaintiff’s satch and take a drinking face, and then have taken the head of the satch on the floor.”

B. As a result of the Defendant’s above assault, the Plaintiff suffered bodily injury, such as an open side of upper knee, right-hand knee, knee, etc., in addition to the cobrake, which requires treatment for about three weeks.

hereinafter referred to as "the injury of this case"

C. As to the instant injury, the Defendant was indicted by the Seoul District Court 2015 High Court Decision 2015 High Court Decision 233, and was issued a summary order of KRW 3,000,000 from the above court on January 27, 2015, and the said summary order became final and conclusive around that time.

2. Determination:

A. According to the facts of the above recognition of the liability for damages, the defendant committed a tort resulting in the injury of this case against the plaintiff. Thus, the defendant is liable for compensating for the damages suffered by the plaintiff.

B. 1) The Plaintiff’s claim that the Plaintiff was liable to compensate for damages that occurred from the instant injury on November 29, 2014, because it was impossible to perform any work since the date of the Plaintiff’s retirement from office, and even until now, lost income equivalent to KRW 10,00,00. However, it is insufficient to acknowledge that the entries in the evidence No. 4-1 through 7, and the evidence No. 5-1, and No. 5-2 are sufficient to prove that the Plaintiff suffered damages as alleged in the above assertion, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise, the Plaintiff’s claim that the Plaintiff paid KRW 5,00,000 for the medical expenses incurred from the instant injury, but it is without merit. However, the Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff paid KRW 5,00,000 due to the instant injury, comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings in each of the statements No. 1-1 through 5,7,8,10,