logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.02.09 2014고정3031
국토의계획및이용에관한법률위반등
Text

The defendant is innocent.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in development activities under C (owner D and E) in the course of harmony with the facts charged.

Any person who intends to change the form and quality of land or convert a mountainous district shall obtain permission from the competent authorities.

Nevertheless, on November 201, 2013, the Defendant did not obtain permission for change of mountainous district and permission for change of mountainous district from the competent viewing with respect to some area of the above-mentioned forest (18,645 square meters) (2,564 square meters) on the beginning and the above-mentioned forest (18,645 square meters).

2. The Defendant denies the facts charged.

The evidence corresponding to the above facts charged has a statement of F and a field photograph.

F's statement was given to the defendant 1 million won and ordered him to cut trees within the permitted scope of the drawings, which correspond to the accused's defense.

G cut and filled up the ground within the scope of the drawings permitted to G, and in return, it paid KRW 0,000 according to the weather level.

In light of the above, on-site photographs are difficult to believe and present circumstances after the completion of the act, and the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to recognize the facts charged, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge them.

Therefore, the facts charged in this case constitute a time when there is no proof of crime, and thus, is acquitted under the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure

arrow