logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원안동지원 2020.12.09 2020가단20074
소유권이전등기
Text

1. Of the 4,5,6,7,8,9, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, and 4 of the [Attachment 1] drawings among the 4,5, 6, 7, 8, 15, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, and 4

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The ownership transfer registration was completed with respect to L65/164 shares, Defendant Republic of Korea 7/164 shares, Defendant G35/164 shares, Defendant I 25/164 shares, Defendant J 32/164 shares, and Defendant J 32/164 shares.

B. Defendant G filed a lawsuit against L, the Republic of Korea, Defendant I, and Defendant J on the ground that co-owners of the land prior to the instant partition are in a sectionally owned co-ownership relationship by specifying the location and size of the land and seeking the implementation of the procedure for the registration of share ownership transfer based on the termination of mutual title trust.

At the time, the defendant G alleged that the attached Table 3 had acquired 115.7 square meters including 107 square meters in the ship on which the attached Table 107 square meters was indicated.

The appellate court of the foregoing case (Seoul District Court 2010Na1386) rendered a judgment on September 16, 2010 on the following grounds: “A portion 107 square meters in the attached Table 3, Defendant G’s portion 107 square meters in the part 107 square meters in the ship; Defendant J 23 square meters in the part 23 square meters in the ship; Defendant J 15 square meters in the part 32/164 square meters in the ship; Defendant J 81 square meters in the part 5 square meters in the part 5 area in the ship; and L is in the sectionally owned co-ownership relation in which Defendant I specified the 216 square meters in the part 5 area in the ship.” On September 16, 2010, the appellate court rendered a judgment on the following: “A portion 107 square meters in the part 107 square meters in the land prior to the instant division; L is 65/164 shares in the part 7/164 shares;

The above ruling was finally affirmed in the Supreme Court (Supreme Court Decision 2010Da86624).

C. On February 23, 2011, Defendant G divided, within the land prior to the instant subdivision, M&M of 107 square meters (107 square meters in part 107 square meters in a ship) into the land prior to the instant subdivision, and completed the registration of transfer in its name with respect to the shares of other co-owners, such as L, etc. according to the said judgment.

L is above the land before the instant partition.

It is not more than 435m2 in the Dong-dong, which is divided as in the same paragraph.

arrow