All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. In light of the fact that the defendants are contrary to the summary of the grounds for appeal, the punishment that the court below sentenced to the defendants (the defendant A: 4 months of imprisonment and the defendant B: 6 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the defendants recognized the crime of this case and seriously reflects the fact that the defendant A should consider equity with the case of receiving a judgment at the same time as the judgment became final and conclusive, the health status of the defendant A is not good, the profits actually acquired by the defendant B can be deemed to be written, and the facts that the defendant B did not have any previous error are favorable circumstances.

However, the Defendants’ crime is disadvantageous to the following: (a) the Defendants acquired a house lease loan by means of a false employment certificate, apartment leasing contract, etc.; and (b) the quality of the crime is not good in light of the method of the crime and the amount of fraud, etc.; (c) the damage recovery has not yet been made up until now; (d) the profits acquired by Defendant A from the instant crime are up to KRW 24 million; and (e) Defendant B did not have any degree of participation such as seeking the method of the instant crime.

In full view of the above circumstances, other circumstances revealed in the records and pleadings, such as character, conduct, environment, etc. of the Defendants, the lower court appears to have taken into account most favorable circumstances, and there is no change in circumstances that would vary from the original judgment and the punishment.

Therefore, since the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable, the defendants' above assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the Defendants’ appeal is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.