The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

1. The plaintiff's grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance except for adding the following arguments to the court of first instance. In light of the evidence submitted in the court of first instance along with the contents of the allegation, the fact-finding and the judgment of the court of first instance are

Therefore, the reasons for this court concerning this case are as follows: the witness H and R in the 6th 15th 15th of the judgment of the court of first instance is "H and R"; the witness R in the 9th 21th Ra is "R of the court of first instance"; the "this court" in the 9th 9th 21 through 10th 10 is "the court of first instance"; the 10th 2nd 10 "the court of first instance" is "the court of first instance"; the 11th 5th Ha "the witness H" is "H of the court of first instance"; the 15th Ha "the 15th Ha" is "the closing point of the court of first instance"; the plaintiff added "the next 2.2. additional determination" to the argument that the plaintiff adds this court is identical to the part of the judgment of the court of first instance; thus, it is cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Additional determination

A. The Plaintiff asserted that, even before receiving H’s request, Defendant C had prepared a certificate of the acquisition of the instant heavy vehicle, and Defendant B signed the instant heavy vehicle in the currency with G employee via piracy, “C confirmed the prices of the instant heavy vehicle and vehicles purchased, signed by himself/herself on the instant agreement, and completed the acquisition of the instant heavy vehicle,” and H applied for the instant heavy vehicle loan by using various loan application documents and identification cards received from Defendant C, which led Defendant C to prepare a certificate of the acquisition of the instant heavy vehicle, and Defendant B made a false statement to Defendant B, and Defendant B made a false statement to Defendant B on the loan of this case by using the aforementioned deception.