1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On January 7, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a “contract to bring in soil for molding (hereinafter “instant contract”) with the content that the Plaintiff would supply soil for molding to the Defendant’s land, and the main contents are as follows.

The place of a construction contract for bringing soil into Korea: The construction cost for the settlement of accounts from January 7, 2015 to February 15, 2015: Payment of 16,000 won per 15 ton after the completion of construction: Settlement of accounts after completion of construction.

1. In bringing in soil to a land-owner’s work site, the contractor shall settle a civil petition at the time of occurrence of the civil petition;

2. 복토용 흙의 종료는 뻘 흙 등의 반입을 금하며, 복토에 적합한 양질의 흙만을 반입해야 한다.

3. A landowner or contractor shall pay the price within three days after the settlement of the amount calculated by settling the total amount of bringing-in after the completion of construction work;

B. During the contract period of the instant case, the Plaintiff supplied the soil from the construction site of a new apartment located in the Masan-dong, Masan-dong, 397-1 and 2 parcels, which are the land owned by the Defendant, with 15 tons of truck, etc.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 (the same as Eul evidence 1) and the whole purport of pleading

2. Determination:

가. 당사자의 주장 1) 원고의 주장 원고는 이 사건 계약에 따라 아산시 모종동 소재 아파트 신축공사현장에서 나오는 양질의 흙을 피고 소유 토지인 아산시 신동 397-1 외 2필지에 계약기간 동안 15톤 덤프트럭 등 총 2023대를 동원하여 운반하여 복토작업을 하였는바, 피고는 약정한 토사운송료 43,854,800원을 지급할 의무가 있다. 2) 피고의 주장 이 사건 계약상 원고는 피고에게 뻘 흙 등을 제외한 복토에 적합한 양질의 흙만을 공급하기로 약정하였음에도 원고는 이에 위반하여 아파트 공사현장에서 반출되는 토사 중 지하수와 혼합된 뻘 흙을 반입하였는바, 피고는 원고에게...