(영문) 부산지방법원동부지원 2014.09.19 2014가합1880

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 부산지방법원동부지원 2014.09.19 2014가합1880

약정금

Text

1. The part concerning the claim for omission in the lawsuit in this case shall be dismissed.

2. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 25,000,000 and this shall apply.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The pertinent Plaintiff is the wife of C, and the Defendant began with C as a member of the council of occupants’ representatives from around 2010 and he/she he/she he/she he/she he/she accumulated his/her friendship, such as household travel.

B. In each letter, the Defendant and C’s family members were suspected of having frequent personal contact with each other, and C and the Defendant prepared each of the following descriptions (hereinafter “each of the instant notes”) on August 19, 201, and signed and sealed the Defendant’s husband E and the Plaintiff as a witness.

1. After this time, C and the Defendant do not have telephone contacts, any form of exchanges or communications, after this time.

2. If the offender violates the above statement, he/she shall pay the solatium to the other spouse within one month, and shall be subject to any civil and criminal punishment.

(hereinafter omitted)

C. On July 24, 2013, after the completion of the instant letter, Defendant and C sent time to the motherel located in Busan Southern-gu F.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry in Gap evidence 1, 3 through 16 (including the paper number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. As to the claim for omission

A. The Plaintiff asserted that, as the Defendant promised not to communicate with C as a letter, the Plaintiff’s assertion that the Defendant should not communicate with C and/or meet with C, the Plaintiff is claiming for omission against the Defendant to the effect that he/she should not have telephone conversations with C.

B. We examine ex officio the legitimacy of this part of the lawsuit.

The text of a judgment shall be clear, and the contents as the text itself shall be specified, so it shall be clearly specified to the extent that there is no doubt about the execution of the judgment, and it shall be clearly stated to the extent that it is possible to see and reject the claim of the parties within any scope.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2005Da60239 Decided March 9, 2006, etc.).

참조판례

-대법원 2006. 3. 9. 선고 2005다60239 판결

유사 판례

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2021.03.24 2020가단210213

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.06.03 2019가단5132301

-의정부지방법원고양지원 2015.11.19 2015가합71191

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.06.09 2019가단5237169

-수원지방법원안산지원 2019.01.11 2018가단63672