logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2012.11.14 2012고단3608
업무상과실치사등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 3,000,000 won, Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 8,00,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B The defendant C is a person in charge of safety management who manages and supervises the field of the "new construction work of Busan E-Gun E-Gun Training Institute" that the defendant C received from the Busan Bank, and the defendant A is a safety manager at the new construction site.

1. In cases where workers are likely to be in danger of danger at the time of performing their work in a place where workers fall or come to fall down at work, or in a machine, equipment, vessel block, etc., Defendant B and Defendant A’s business owner shall install a working signal board by means of assembling a vision, etc., and where it is difficult to install a safety signal board, he/she shall install a safety signal net, and where it is difficult to install a safety signal net, he/she shall take measures necessary to prevent a fall risk, such as having workers wear a safety belt, etc., and where workers wear a safety signal at a place at a height of at least two meters high from the falling risk, equipment, etc. to be used safely shall be installed

In addition, in the case of the business of assembling, dismantling, or changing the vision of not less than five meters in height, the business owner must take measures to prevent fall, such as installing a light board with a width of not less than 20 centimeters and allowing workers to use safety belts.

Defendant

A around 09:50 on March 29, 2012, around 09:0, at the construction site of the foregoing training institute, the victim F (the 46-year-old age), a stock company C, ordered the victim F (the 46-year-old age-old employee), to dismantle the pipes from the outer wall at a height of about 20 meters between the 2 to 3rd floors of the convenience building of the training institute. Defendant B, as the site manager, was the above-mentioned decommissioning work, and was well aware of the fact.

In such a case, Defendant B is a safety manager, Defendant A is a safety manager, and workers.

arrow