A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 11, 2017, at around 01:20, the Defendant filed a 112 declaration while participating in a dispute with a person who has avoided tobacco on the front of Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Officetel.

The Defendant, upon receiving the report 112, was a policeman E, F, G, or policeman, who was solicited to return home from H to the police station affiliated with the police station of the Incheon Western Police Station D, and was called “scambling like the police station” and was on the patrol vehicle in order to have him embarked on the back of the patrol vehicle and on the patrol vehicle in the manner of mind, and continued to refuse to set off the vehicle, and kept up a parking control signboard on the floor of the patrol vehicle, which was located in the between the patrol vehicle and the between the patrol vehicle.

When the police officers, such as the above patrolmen E, were sitting on the bridges of patrol vehicles, the Defendant dumpeded on the bridges of patrol vehicles, and dumped them to the police officers, and used them to interfere with the course of patrol vehicles, such as lying them on the bump.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties on the maintenance of public peace and order related to the handling of 112 reported cases by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and I;

1. Application of investigation reports (to attach photographs by attaching screen images at the time of this case), CDs and photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution ( normal consideration considered as follows):

1. Based on the reasoning of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, the sentencing conditions specified in the instant trial process, such as Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, family relationship, family environment, motive and means of crime, and circumstances after crime, shall be determined as ordered.

A favorable circumstance: A defendant has no record of punishment, except for punishment by a fine already imposed on him/her once.

Unfavorable circumstances: State's public authority to interfere with police officers' performance of official duties.