logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2020.01.10 2019구합3544
정보공개결정처분 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

The purpose of the Plaintiff is to improve the maintenance and repair facilities of the expressway and its equivalent roads, develop traffic safety facilities, manufacture, sell, export and import, install and operate, etc.

On January 10, 2019, the Defendant publicly announced the tender for the C’s project (hereinafter referred to as “instant tender”) with the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Financial Notice D, and the detailed criteria applicable to the examination of qualifications for the relevant service are as follows:

1) Criteria for evaluation: Comprehensive average (100) evaluation method: performance (10) = Management status (30) (30) performance results (30) performance results (40 points): Criteria for service performance performance records completed (6) for the last three years as of the date of public announcement of tender as of the date of public announcement of tender - The scope of recognition for service performance - The area of traffic signal (including control devices, additional devices, supplementary devices, and auxiliary devices) maintenance services - If the amount of service completion is at least 10 million won under a single contract - Basic amount: Basic amount: 1,496,000,000 won and certificate of performance results of service performance for the examination of qualifications to verify the performance of qualifications for participation: The amount exceeding 30 (b) management status (excluding evaluation at the time of prior approval) performance results and the amount exceeding 10 (30) performance capabilities of new service performance points and 100 (1) performance capabilities evaluation of new service performance points within the extent of 100 (30) performance capabilities evaluation points); and (1) evaluation of new service performance points.

The plaintiff became a second priority as a result of opening.

arrow