The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Around March 20, 2010, around 02:40 on March 20, 2010, the Defendant, a summary of the facts charged, led to a disturbance of drinking in front of the D main points located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

2. As evidence that seems to correspond to the facts charged in the instant case, there is a witness E’s legal statement and a self-conceptic report.

The report on the self-recoveration of the crime states that the defendant committed an act of disturbing drinking at the time and place specified in the facts charged, but on the other hand, the report on the self-recoveration of the above crime states that "the refusal to affix the seal" is stated in the criminal signature column, and the police officer E who prepared the report on the self-recoveration of the crime at the time does not completely memory the details of the report

Considering the statement, the above evidence alone proves that the defendant committed a crime without reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime.

subsection (b) of this section.

3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, a not-guilty verdict is rendered pursuant to the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, but the summary of the judgment in this case should not be disclosed in accordance with the proviso of Article 58(2) of